All systems operational
Q3 2017

Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?

Humberto Guanche Garcell · Ariadna Villanueva Arias · Fernando Ramírez Miranda · Reynol Rubiera Jimenez · Ramón N. Alfonso Serrano
10.5339/qmj.2017.1 389 Views 10 Citations
10
Citations
389
Views
Abstract


Background: Direct observation of hand hygiene is the standard practice recommended by the World Health Organization to monitor its compliance. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of hand hygiene observation performed by units' observers. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out in seven patient care units in a 75-bed community hospital in Qatar. Four trained nurses performed hand hygiene observation in May 2016, any day of the week and in different shifts, following the same methodology as routine units' observers. Hand hygiene opportunities were registered, including hand hygiene moments, staff category, and actions (handrubs, hand washing, missed hand hygiene, and gloves without hand hygiene). Results: During January–May 2016, routine monitoring reported 25,319 opportunities with a compliance of 89.2%, and 91.6% for nurses, 89.6% for physicians, and 85.1% for ancillary staff. Trained external observers reported 815 opportunities and compliance of 54.7%, with the highest compliance observed after blood and body fluid exposure (80.0%) and after patient contact (85.5%), and the lowest figures before patient contact (34.2%) and before aseptic procedure (34.0%). Conclusion: This study provides essential information about the accuracy of the monitoring procedure and the compliance of hand hygiene that requires immediate action to protect patients and staff from healthcare-associated infections.

Cite this Article (APA)
Humberto, G. G., Ariadna, V. A., Fernando, R. M., Reynol, R. J., Ramón, N. A. S. (2017). Direct observation of hand hygiene can show differences in staff compliance: Do we need to evaluate the accuracy for patient safety?. Qatar Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2017.1
Related Papers
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019
Ahmed Labib · 2020
14
cites
393
Trauma intensive care unit (TICU) at Hamad General Hospital
Talat Chughtai; Ashok Parchani; Gustav Strandvik; Vishy Verma; Suresh Arumugam; · 2020
6
cites
391
Journal club as a tool to facilitate evidence based practice in critical care
Emad Almomani; Tawfiq Alraoush; Omar Sadah; Ahmed Al Nsour; Megha Kamble; Jisha · 2020
6
cites
392
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 0253-8253
Quartile Q3
AMS Score 87
Field Medicine & Health Sciences
Publisher Hamad Medical Corporation
Country 🇶🇦 Qatar
View Journal Profile →
Authors
Publication Details
Year 2017
Language English
Added 24 Jul 2026