All systems operational
Q2 2026

Discordance between observer and patient-reported shared decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Eman S. Al Sulais · Mohammmed A. AlBesher · Zahra A. Al Saeed · Ayman A. Sakr · Dimah A. Alaskar · Turki A. AlAmeel
10.4103/sjg.sjg_99_26 386 Views 0 Citations
0
Citations
386
Views
Abstract

Abstract

Background:
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Optimal management of this condition requires collaboration between patients and physicians, a process known as shared decision-making (SDM). In this study, we aim to evaluate the quality of SDM in gastroenterology clinics in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.


Methods:
This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2024 and December 2025. Audio recordings of gastroenterology visits were independently assessed by two reviewers using the validated Observing Patient Involvement in Decision-Making (OPTION-5) scale. Moreover, patients evaluated their encounters using the 9-item SDM Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of SDM from both the patient and physician perspectives.


Results:

A total of 105 encounters from three hospitals were analyzed with a median OPTION-5 score of 5 out of 100 (IQR 0–10). A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that longer consultation duration in minutes (
β
= 1.88, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.21–3.56,
P
= 0.028) and the decision to start a new medication (
β
= 24.86, 95% CI: 17.24–32.48,
P
< 0.001) were independently associated with higher total OPTION-5 scores. There was no significant correlation between observer-rated OPTION-5 scores and patient-reported SDM-Q-9 scores (Spearman’s
ρ
= –0.044,
P
= 0.687), indicating discordance between externally assessed and patient-perceived shared decision-making.



Conclusion:
In this cohort of patients with IBD from three centers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, observer-rated SDM was low. Multiple factors were significantly associated with the level of SDM, including longer consultation duration and decision to start new medication. Further studies to determine interventions that can enhance SDM are warranted.

Cite this Article (APA)
Eman, S. A. S., Mohammmed, A. A., Zahra, A. A. S., Ayman, A. S., Dimah, A. A., Turki, A. A. (2026). Discordance between observer and patient-reported shared decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_99_26
Related Papers
The burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and viral hepatitis in Saudi …
Saleh A. Alqahtani; Faisal Abaalkhail; Saad Alghamdi; Khalid Bzeizi; Waleed K. A · 2024
20
cites
397
CEBPB dampens the cuproptosis sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by facilitating the PI3K/AKT/mT…
Tianchen Huang; Yong Zhang; Yachao Wu; Xiaodong Han; Lei Li; Zhipeng Guo; Kan Li · 2024
15
cites
398
SASLT guidelines: Update in treatment of hepatitis C virus infection, 2024
Abdullah S. Alghamdi; Hamdan Alghamdi; Haleema A. Alserehi; Mohammed A. Babatin; · 2024
11
cites
397
The effectiveness of vedolizumab in advanced therapy-experienced ulcerative colitis patients: Real w…
Nahla Azzam; Othman Alharbi; Mansour Altuwaijri; Yazed Alruthia; Heba Alfarhan; · 2024
9
cites
396
The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and …
Mohammed A. Alzahrani; Abdullah M. Alqaraawi; Saeed R. Alzubide; Ehab Abufarhane · 2024
7
cites
395
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 1319-3767
Quartile Q2
AMS Score 93
Field Medicine & Health Sciences
Publisher Wolters Kluwer / Saudi Gastroentero
Country 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
View Journal Profile →
Authors
Publication Details
Year 2026
Language English
Added 23 Jul 2026