All systems operational
Q3 2021

Comparison of different shock wave frequencies on stone disintegration in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; 60, 80 and 100/min

Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed El Taher · A. Reda · A. M. Abdel Latif · M. A. El Gammal
10.1186/s12301-020-00109-7 379 Views 0 Citations
0
Citations
379
Views
Abstract

Abstract

Background
We know that SWL started on February 07, 1980, by Christian Chaussy with a wide range of indications. Complication rate has always remained very low and usually limited to minor side effects and complications. This study shows the impact of different shock wave release frequencies 60, 80 & 100/min on disintegration of renal stones.


Methods
A total number of 210 patients with mean age (40 ± 15) years with renal stone who were candidate for SWL divided into 3 groups each are 70 patients on rate 60,80 and 100 per min), Chi-Square test, Fisher’s exact test used in the study.


Results
Complete stone clearance( defined as complete stone free) was obtained in 184 patients 87.6% after one session, the highest success rate 94.3% were obtained in the second group of patients ( with shock wave frequency 80/min) followed by the first group 87.1% (with shock wave frequency 60/min), and patients with highest frequency (100/min) had the lowest success rate 81.4%.


Conclusions
The best option is using intermediate shock wave rate 80/min to obtain highest success rate and mild pain. Using high rate 100/min is not favorable due to least disintegration rate with highest pain. Using rate 60/min shows less success than rate 80/min despite it less painful.

Cite this Article (APA)
Mohamed, A. M. E. T., A., R., A., M. A. L., M., A. E. G. (2021). Comparison of different shock wave frequencies on stone disintegration in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; 60, 80 and 100/min. African Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-00109-7
Related Papers
Deep insights into urinary tract infections and effective natural remedies
Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz; Sareh Darvishi Fork; Reza Ahmadi; Bahman Khameneh · 2021
49
cites
389
35
cites
388
Forgotten ureteral double-J stents and related complications: a real-world experience
Sachin Patil; Kshitij Raghuvanshi; Devendra Kumar Jain; Abid Raval · 2020
33
cites
390
Forgotten ureteral stents: Risk factors, complications and management
A.Y. Abdelaziz; W.B. Fouda; A.A. Mosharafa; M.A. Abelrasoul; A. Fayyad; K. Fawzi · 2018
21
cites
390
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 1110-5704
Quartile Q3
AMS Score 85
Field Medicine & Health Sciences
Publisher Springer Nature
Country 🇪🇬 Egypt
View Journal Profile →
Authors
Publication Details
Year 2021
Language English
Added 24 Aug 2026