All systems operational
Q3 2020

Sensitivity and Specificity of Gold Chromatography Immuno-Assays IgM/IgG Antibody Test for COVID-19: Review of the current literature

Sahar Elderdiri Gafar Osman · Ehab Mohammed Elmadenah Mohammed Mohammed Ahmed · Nazik Elmaliaka Hussain
10.18502/sjms.v15i5.6969 383 Views 2 Citations
2
Citations
383
Views
Abstract

Abstract:
Background: The World Health Organization recommends molecular tests (PCR) to the diagnosis of COVID-19, which detect the (SARS-CoV2) virus RNA. However, these tests are expensive and give a high negative result. There were urgent medical and public health needs for early diagnosis and treatment to minimize the spread of COVID-19. This review aimed to summarize known to date information about the latest research progress of the sensitivity and specificity of rapid combined IgM/IgG antibody test to diagnose the pandemic novel coronavirus.
Methods: The literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, supplemented by (Web of Science electronic databases), with the search term (COVID19 or COVID-19, novel coronavirus, SARS CoV-2 or SARS CoV2, Rapid antibody test, IgM/IgG, sensitivity, specificity).
Results: The review included eight clinical studies for a total of 782 patients with COVID-19 and 631 healthy control. The sensitivity and specificity of Gold Chromatography Immuno-Assays (GCIAs) IgM/IgG rapid test vary greatly among published studies. The IgM/IgG sensitivity ranged from 73.9 to 89.3% in 6/8 (75%) studies and the IgM/IgG specificity ranged from 88.9 to 100% in the eight (100%) reviewed studies. The pooled data revealed that the average of sensitivity and specificity was 70% and 94.5%, respectively. They agreed on its simplicity, fastness, and fewer requirements.
Conclusion: The GCIAs IgM/IgG rapid tests are simply fast and safe. Besides their short turnaround time, no specific equipment or skilled technicians’ requirements, they can serve as a rapid diagnostic test of RT-PCR-negative symptomatic patients and screening of SARS CoV-2 carriers. It cannot take the place of PCR, but the huge lab diagnosis pressure can be greatly relieved and more research is needed to detect its reliability in limited-resource settings. 
Keywords: COVID-19, Rapid Test, IgM/IgG, Sensitivity, Specificity, Limited-resource.

Cite this Article (APA)
Sahar, E. G. O., Ehab, M. E. M. M. A., Nazik, E. H. (2020). Sensitivity and Specificity of Gold Chromatography Immuno-Assays IgM/IgG Antibody Test for COVID-19: Review of the current literature. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v15i5.6969
Related Papers
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding COVID-19 among Sudan citizens during the pandemic: a…
Khawla Nasr Aldeen Altayb Mousa; Malaz Malik Yousif Saad; Mohammed Tayseer Bashi · 2020
21
cites
394
Social Meaning and Consequences of Infertility in Ogbomoso, Nigeria
Fehintola A O; Fehintola F O; Ogunlaja OA; Awotunde T O; Ogunlaja IP; Onwudiegwu · 2017
17
cites
393
Knowledge, Practice and Willingness to Participate in Community Health Insurance Scheme among Househ…
Aderibigbe S. Adedeji; Aganaba Doyin; Osagbemi G. Kayode; Aderibigbe A. Ayodele · 2017
15
cites
393
Patient Satisfaction and Its Predictors in the General Hospitals of Southwest Saudi Arabia: A Cross-…
Anas Elias; Suhaila Abdalkarim; Walaa Mohammed M; Ghaliya Yahya Ali; Manal Moham · 2022
12
cites
395
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 1858-5051
Quartile Q3
AMS Score 72
Field Medicine & Health Sciences
Publisher Knowledge E DMCC
Country 🇸🇩 Sudan
View Journal Profile →
Authors
Publication Details
Year 2020
Language English/Arabic
Added 19 Aug 2026