Q3 2026

Decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury: a scoping review of contemporary evidence (2020–2025)

Fabio Grassia · Muhammad Riaz
10.1186/s41984-026-00557-3 385 المشاهدات 0 الاقتباسات
0
الاقتباسات
385
المشاهدات
الملخص

Abstract

Background
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a life-saving measure in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its long-term functional outcome and the time of subsequent cranioplasty remain debated. Recent evidence indicates that cranioplasty can have a neurorestorative effect beyond the simple restoration of anatomy.


Objective
To map recent evidence (2020–2025) on DC and cranioplasty in adult severe TBI, focusing on timing, functional outcomes, complications, and survival.


Methods
A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched for English-language original research published from January 2020 to January 2025. Studies involving adult patients (≥ 18 years) with severe TBI undergoing DC, with or without subsequent cranioplasty, were included. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, timing of cranioplasty, functional outcomes, mortality, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.


Results

Five studies (one randomized controlled trial, four observational cohorts;
n
 = 108–408) were included. Across included observational studies, earlier cranioplasty (variably defined as ≤ 2–3 months post-DC) was frequently reported to be associated with improved neurological function and rehabilitation engagement, without a proportional increase in complications. The RESCUE-ASDH trial found no statistically significant difference in mortality between DC and craniotomy (32.2% vs. 30.2%); early cranioplasty independently improved long-term survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42–0.97). Complication profiles, including infection and hydrocephalus, were comparable between early and delayed cranioplasty when patients were appropriately selected. Heterogeneity existed in timing definitions, outcome measures, and follow-up durations, highlighting the need for standardized reporting.



Conclusion
DC remains a critical life-saving procedure in severe TBI, and Early cranioplasty (≤ 90 days) is frequently reported to be associated with improved functional recovery and survival, without significantly increasing major complications. Clinical decisions should be individualized based on patient stability, radiological findings, infection risk, and rehabilitation potential. Standardized definitions and prospective trials are needed to optimize timing and outcomes.

الاستشهاد بهذا المقال (APA)
Fabio, G., Muhammad, R. (2026). Decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury: a scoping review of contemporary evidence (2020–2025). Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-026-00557-3
أبحاث ذات صلة
Extended endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of suprasellar meningiomas
Hazem Mohamed Negm; Ahmed Gabry Elnaggar; Mohammed Dorrah; Aya Gharib; Mohamed A · 2026
3
استشهاد
395
Global disparities in neurosurgery simulation: a 22-year bibliometric analysis (2003–2025)
Ashel Chelsea Dsouza; Vikas Naik; Anudeep Sathyanarayan · 2025
3
استشهاد
390
Fibrin glue in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: a simple addition-a significant…
A. Mudasir; K. Sanna; M. Nayil; A. Zulfikar; W. Abrar; B. Mohsin; A. Sajad · 2025
3
استشهاد
390
Comparison of outcomes after unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopi…
Abdullah Afridi; Ayesha Zulfiqar; Muhammad Waqar Shahid; Fatima Sajjad; Hamnah S · 2026
2
استشهاد
390
الوصول
عرض النص الكامل عبر DOI
نُشر في
الرقم الدولي ISSN 2520-8225
الربعية Q3
درجة المؤشر القياس العربي 77
التخصص Medicine & Health Sciences
الناشر Springer (Biomed Central Ltd.)
الدولة 🇪🇬 Egypt
عرض ملف المجلة →
المؤلفون
تفاصيل النشر
السنة 2026
اللغة English
أُضيف في 14 Aug 2026