Combined Conventional and Pulsed ‘CCPRF’ Versus Pulsed ‘PRF’ Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Refractory Typical Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Multicentric, Retrospective and Comparative study.

Mohamed Elkazaz; Ali Khedr

doi:10.21608/pajn.2022.147993.1061

10.21608/pajn.2022.147993.1061 387 المشاهدات 0 الاقتباسات

الاقتباسات

387

المشاهدات

الملخص غير متوفر لهذا المنشور.

الاستشهاد بهذا المقال (APA)

Mohamed, E., Ali, K. (2023). Combined Conventional and Pulsed ‘CCPRF’ Versus Pulsed ‘PRF’ Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Refractory Typical Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Multicentric, Retrospective and Comparative study.. Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.21608/pajn.2022.147993.1061

Abdeslam El Khamlichi · 2022

استشهاد

388

Comparison of Efficacy of Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Denervation and Intraarticular Depot Methylp…

Mohamed Eissa; abdelrhman moustafa; Mohamed Sawan; wael Nazim; Ahmed Salah · 2022

استشهاد

392

Unilateral combined stereotactic radiofrequency pallidotomy and thalamotomy for Idiopathic Parkinson…

Mohamed Elkazaz; Ali Khedr; Maha Abdelfattah · 2023

استشهاد

390

Ulnar Nerve in Situ Decompression versus Transposition for Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Long-…