Combined Conventional and Pulsed ‘CCPRF’ Versus Pulsed ‘PRF’ Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Refractory Typical Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Multicentric, Retrospective and Comparative study.

Mohamed Elkazaz; Ali Khedr

doi:10.21608/pajn.2022.147993.1061

Q4 2023

Combined Conventional and Pulsed ‘CCPRF’ Versus Pulsed ‘PRF’ Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Refractory Typical Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Multicentric, Retrospective and Comparative study.

Mohamed Elkazaz · Ali Khedr

10.21608/pajn.2022.147993.1061 385 Views 0 Citations

Citations

385

Views

Abstract not available for this publication.

Cite this Article (APA)

Mohamed, E., Ali, K. (2023). Combined Conventional and Pulsed ‘CCPRF’ Versus Pulsed ‘PRF’ Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Refractory Typical Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Multicentric, Retrospective and Comparative study.. Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.21608/pajn.2022.147993.1061