All systems operational
Q1 2025

Selection of essential oil extraction methods using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) approaches

Hasnae El Allaoui · Kawthar El Ahmadi · Aouatif Elabdouni · Mohamed Bouhrim · Bruno Eto · Abdelaaty Abdelaziz Shahat Hussein · Rashed N. Herqash · Khadija Haboubi · Mohamed El Bastrioui · Yahya El Hammoudani
10.25259/jksus_296_2024 394 Views 2 Citations
2
Citations
394
Views
Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) play an important role in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries for their therapeutic and aromatic properties. Selecting the appropriate extraction method is crucial for optimizing yield, quality, and environmental impact. This study uses a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) ranking method to evaluate and rank EO extraction techniques. AHP determines the weights of evaluation criteria, while PROMETHEE ranks methods based on these weights. All traditional and modern techniques are assessed. Results show that supercritical fluid extraction for modern techniques and steam distillation (SD) for traditional techniques are the most effective methods due to their superior performance across multiple criteria. This framework provides insights into selecting optimal extraction methods tailored to industrial needs. The study emphasizes the importance of a systematic approach in selecting extraction methods, highlighting the high yield and quality preservation of supercritical fluid extraction, as well as the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of SD. It underscores the need for industries to consider various criteria, including environmental impact and safety, in their decision-making processes. Future research should refine these techniques and explore new methods to enhance the efficiency and sustainability of EO extraction.

Cite this Article (APA)
Hasnae, E. A., Kawthar, E. A., Aouatif, E., Mohamed, B., Bruno, E., Abdelaaty, A. S. H., Rashed, N. H., Khadija, H., Mohamed, E. B., Yahya, E. H. (2025). Selection of essential oil extraction methods using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) approaches. Journal of King Saud University – Science. https://doi.org/10.25259/jksus_296_2024
Related Papers
Short-term wind power prediction based on IBOA-AdaBoost-RVM
Yongliang Yuan; Qingkang Yang; Jianji Ren; Kunpeng Li; Zhenxi Wang; Yanan Li; Wu · 2024
33
cites
402
A parametrized approach to generalized fractional integral inequalities: Hermite–Hadamard and Maclau…
Abdelghani Lakhdari; Bandar Bin-Mohsin; Fahd Jarad; Hongyan Xu; Badreddine Mefta · 2024
20
cites
397
Modulatory effects of glutamic acid on growth, photosynthetic pigments, and stress responses in oliv…
Muhammad Hamzah Saleem; Sadia Zafar; Sadia Javed; Muhammad Anas; Temoor Ahmed; S · 2024
19
cites
401
Cloud spot instance price forecasting multi-headed models tuned using modified PSO
Mohamed Salb; Luka Jovanovic; Ali Elsadai; Nebojsa Bacanin; Vladimir Simic; Drag · 2024
17
cites
401
16
cites
403
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 1018-3647
Quartile Q1
AMS Score 100
Field Natural Sciences
Publisher King Saud University
Country 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
View Journal Profile →
Authors
Publication Details
Year 2025
Language English
Added 14 Jul 2026