All systems operational
Q1 2025

Unveiling comparative bioactivities of Kratom leaf extracts obtained via maceration and ultrasonic techniques: Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibiofilm effects with molecular docking of Q-ToF-LCMS identified compounds and ADMET prediction

Taslima Begum · Mohd Hafiz Arzmi · ABM Helal Uddin · Mohd Salleh Rofiee · Syed Adnan Ali Shah · Humaira Parveen · Sayeed Mukhtar · Qamar Uddin Ahmed
10.25259/jksus_1185_2025 386 Views 1 Citations
1
Citations
386
Views
Abstract


Traditional medicinal practices across Southeast Asia, particularly in Thailand and Malaysia, have long utilized Kratom
(Mitragyna speciosa
) leaves for the treatment of various health conditions. However, the medicinal potential of this plant has not been properly examined. Hence, this research study was performed to explore the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibiofilm properties of Kratom leaf extracts, along with the identification of biologically active phytochemical components via quadrupole time-of-flight liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (Q-ToF-LCMS) and
in silico
approaches to assess their potential as new antibacterial agents. Accordingly, 12 leaf extracts were prepared and categorized into three distinct groups based on extraction techniques: maceration, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and fractionation. Each extract was subjected to phytochemical screening, including assessments of total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and antioxidant activity via DPPH radical scavenging and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay (FRAP) reduction assays. In addition, antibacterial and antibiofilm activities were evaluated using disc diffusion, broth microdilution, and biofilm inhibition assays against
Escherichia coli
,
Streptococcus mutans,
and
Staphylococcus aureus
. Ultimately, 100% methanol extracts, obtained through both maceration and ultrasonic extraction, exhibited the highest antioxidant activity across all tested parameters. Specifically: maceration (100% Methanol M) (TPC: 257.46 ± 1.32 mg GAE/g extract; TFC: 50.75 ± 0.24 mg QE/g extract; FRAP: 2103.46 ± 5.67 mg AAE/g extract, DPPH IC
50
: 7.94 ± 0.12 µg/mL), and ultrasonic extraction (100% Methanol U) (TPC: 340.99 ± 2.38 mg GAE/g extract; TFC: 62.95± 0.77 mg QE/g extract; FRAP: 2365.99 ± 3.39 mg AAE/g extract, DPPH IC
50
: 7.57 ± 0.24 µg/mL). Among the fractions derived from 100% methanol maceration, the ethyl acetate fraction demonstrated superior antioxidant activity compared to the corresponding alkaloid fraction, with the following values: (TPC: 337.00 ± 19.60 mg GAE/g extract; TFC: 57.72 ± 3.79 mg QE/g extract; FRAP: 2981.70 ± 40.6 mg AAE/g extract, DPPH IC
50
: 15.03 ± 0.54 µg/mL). The ethyl acetate fraction exhibited the highest activity with MICs of
S. aureus
(1.25 mg/mL) and
S. mutans
(2.5 mg/mL). Compounds identified through Q-ToF LC-MS analysis demonstrated favorable molecular interactions and strong binding affinities with the target protein of
S. aureus
(PDB ID: 3U2D) as revealed by molecular docking studies. Finally, 6-hydroxyluteolin 5-rhamnoside, kaempferol 3-(6’’-p-coumarylglucoside)-7-glucoside, 6-hydroxyluteoin-7-(6’’’-p-coumarylsophoroside), 8-hydroxyluteolin 8-glucoside, luteolin 7-rhamnosyl(1-6)galactoside, along with 10-hydroxyyohimbine showed great potential as leads for developing new antibacterial agents.

Cite this Article (APA)
Taslima, B., Mohd, H. A., ABM, H. U., Mohd, S. R., Syed, A. A. S., Humaira, P., Sayeed, M., Qamar, U. A. (2025). Unveiling comparative bioactivities of Kratom leaf extracts obtained via maceration and ultrasonic techniques: Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antibiofilm effects with molecular docking of Q-ToF-LCMS identified compounds and ADMET prediction. Journal of King Saud University – Science. https://doi.org/10.25259/jksus_1185_2025
Related Papers
Short-term wind power prediction based on IBOA-AdaBoost-RVM
Yongliang Yuan; Qingkang Yang; Jianji Ren; Kunpeng Li; Zhenxi Wang; Yanan Li; Wu · 2024
33
cites
402
A parametrized approach to generalized fractional integral inequalities: Hermite–Hadamard and Maclau…
Abdelghani Lakhdari; Bandar Bin-Mohsin; Fahd Jarad; Hongyan Xu; Badreddine Mefta · 2024
20
cites
396
Modulatory effects of glutamic acid on growth, photosynthetic pigments, and stress responses in oliv…
Muhammad Hamzah Saleem; Sadia Zafar; Sadia Javed; Muhammad Anas; Temoor Ahmed; S · 2024
19
cites
401
Cloud spot instance price forecasting multi-headed models tuned using modified PSO
Mohamed Salb; Luka Jovanovic; Ali Elsadai; Nebojsa Bacanin; Vladimir Simic; Drag · 2024
17
cites
401
16
cites
401
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 1018-3647
Quartile Q1
AMS Score 100
Field Natural Sciences
Publisher King Saud University
Country 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
View Journal Profile →
Authors
Publication Details
Year 2025
Language English
Added 14 Jul 2026