Q1 2026

Impact of Wettability on Polymer Retention in Carbonates: A Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Tests Through Different Quantification Techniques

Álvaro Hernández-Morales · Emad W. Al-Shalabi · Muhammad Mushtaq · Waleed AlAmeri
10.1007/s13369-026-11509-2 391 المشاهدات 0 الاقتباسات
0
الاقتباسات
391
المشاهدات
الملخص

Abstract

Low polymer retention is essential in polymer flooding to minimize environmental impact and ensure accurate project design. Among the factors influencing retention, wettability remains critical yet insufficiently understood, particularly in carbonate formations. Most prior studies focus on sandstones and rarely assess wettability effects under static adsorption conditions. Moreover, the precision of polymer retention quantification varies across analytical techniques. This study investigates the influence of wettability on polymer retention through static and dynamic experiments using an ATBS-based polymer in carbonate lithology. Wettability alteration was induced by controlled aging at varying durations (8 h, 3 days, and 14 days at 90 °C) for both cores and rock powder. Polymer flooding was performed on five Indiana limestone cores at 167,114 ppm salinity and 50 °C, in both oil-presence and oil-free conditions. Dynamic polymer retention was quantified using effluent viscosity, UV–Vis spectroscopy, and TOC-TN analysis for inter-method comparison. The Amott wettability index to water (
δ
w
) decreased from 0.20 after 8 h of aging to 0.09 and 0.08 after 3 and 14 days, respectively, indicating a progressive reduction in water-wetness and a shift toward near-neutral/mixed-wet conditions with an increasing oil-wet tendency. Dynamic retention in the presence of oil decreased by 35–51% relative to oil-free conditions, with cores exhibiting more pronounced oil-wet tendencies showing up to an additional 21% decline (≈6 
µ
g/g-rock lower retention). Conversely, static adsorption values remained significantly higher (305–337 
µ
g/g-rock), showing negligible dependence on wettability changes or the presence of oil. The deviation between dynamic retention values obtained from the analytical techniques within each individual coreflooding test ranged from 6.82 to 8.27% under single-phase conditions and increased to 11.10–11.60% in two-phase experiments, primarily due to oil traces and shear-induced viscosity degradation, which are known to affect UV–Vis absorbance and rheology-based calculations. Consequently, TOC–TN results were adopted as the reference for comparative analyses due to their lower sensitivity to these interferences and their robustness in oil-bearing effluents. Overall, the findings highlight how wettability ranging from weakly water-wet to near-neutral/mixed-wet conditions with increasing oil-wet tendency influences both static and dynamic tests and emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate analytical methodologies for accurate polymer retention measurements in carbonate systems.

الاستشهاد بهذا المقال (APA)
Álvaro, H., Emad, W. A., Muhammad, M., Waleed, A. (2026). Impact of Wettability on Polymer Retention in Carbonates: A Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Tests Through Different Quantification Techniques. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-026-11509-2
أبحاث ذات صلة
UAV Path Planning and Trajectory Optimization: A Comprehensive Survey
Tarek Sheltami; Gamil Ahmed; Mustafa Ghaleb; Ashraf Mahmoud · 2025
14
استشهاد
396
Damage Assessment of Structures Following the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: A Dataset-…
Kurtulus Atasever; Hasan Huseyin Aydogdu; Furkan Narlitepe; Caglar Goksu; Ugur D · 2025
6
استشهاد
397
Generative Adversarial Networks for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Survey of Applicati…
Mohammad Alauthman; Nauman Aslam; Ahmad Al-Qerem; Amjad Aldweesh; Pradorn Sureep · 2026
6
استشهاد
397
5
استشهاد
394
الوصول
عرض النص الكامل عبر DOI
نُشر في
الرقم الدولي ISSN 2193-567X
الربعية Q1
درجة المؤشر القياس العربي 100
التخصص Engineering & Technology
الناشر Springer / King Fahd University of
الدولة 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
عرض ملف المجلة →
المؤلفون
تفاصيل النشر
السنة 2026
اللغة English
أُضيف في 13 Jul 2026