All systems operational
Q2 2025 Vol. 19 · No. 2 · pp. 428-451

High-dose statins for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Muhammed Siddique Shahid · Mariam Safwan Bourgleh · Adel Alharfi · Shahad Albariqi · Lamia Albalawi · Rema Alohali · Turki Albaqami · Moaz Safwan Bourgleh
10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112 1,204 Views 4 Citations
4
Citations
1,204
Views
Vol. 19, No.2
Volume / Issue
428-451
Pages
Abstract


INTRODUCTION:
Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality, with fatal outcomes increased with recurrent strokes. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the safety and efficacy of high-dose statins for secondary IS prevention.


METHODS:
This review was regestered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024574088). Cochrane methodology was followed in this review and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov, to include all RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2024, comparing high-dose statins (simvastatin ≥40 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg, and rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) with low-dose statins, placebo, or standard care. Outcomes of this review were recurrent IS reduction and adverse events reported in RCTs.


RESULTS:

Nine RCTs involving 5,503 patients, with male patients ranging from 25.8% to 81.6% were included. Compared to controls, high-dose statins did not significantly reduce risks for secondary IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00],
P
=.05) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29],
P
=.45). Furthermore, no differences were observed in mortality rates and adverse events between groups.



CONCLUSION:
Treatment with high dose statins didn't reduce the risk of stroke recurrence or improve mortality, though further research is needed.

Cite this Article (APA)
Muhammed, S. S., Mariam, S. B., Adel, A., Shahad, A., Lamia, A., Rema, A., Turki, A., Moaz, S. B. (2025). High-dose statins for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 19(2), 428-451. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112
Related Papers
Gastrointestinal safety of semaglutide and tirzepatide vs. placebo in obese individuals without diab…
Moaz Safwan; Mariam Safwan Bourgleh; Shahad Abdullah Alotaibi; Eman Alotaibi; Ab · 2025
11
cites
1,081
Efficacy and safety of semaglutide: real-world tertiary care experience from Saudi Arabia
Muhammad Imran Butt; Khalid Mania Alkhalifah; Muhammad Riazuddin; Saud Mohammed · 2024
9
cites
1,709
Prevalence of hyponatremia among medically hospitalized patients and associated outcomes: a retrospe…
Intisar Hamood Al Yaqoubi; Juhaina Salim Al-Maqbali; Afnan Ahmed Al Farsi; Rayan · 2024
8
cites
1,982
Estimating the prevalence of select non-communicable diseases in Saudi Arabia using a population-bas…
Suliman Alghnam; Mohammad Bosaeed; Abdulrahman Aljouie; Saeed Mastour Alshahrani · 2024
5
cites
1,931
Access
View Full Text via DOI
Published in
ISSN 0256-4947
Quartile Q2
AMS Score 83
Field Medicine & Health Sciences
Publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital
Country 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
View Journal Profile →
Authors
M
Muhammed Siddique Shahid
M
Mariam Safwan Bourgleh
A
Adel Alharfi
S
Shahad Albariqi
L
Lamia Albalawi
R
Rema Alohali
T
Turki Albaqami
M
Moaz Safwan Bourgleh
Publication Details
Year 2025
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 428-451
Language English
Added 23 Jun 2026